Jones Estate
This text of 59 A.2d 50 (Jones Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an appeal from a decree of an orphans’ court rejecting a claim against a decedent’s estate based on the breach of an alleged oral contract of decedent to will claimant her entire estate. We agree with the learned court below that the evidence failed to establish a contract: Roberts Estate, 350 Pa. 467, 39 A. 2d 592; Cramer v. McKinney et al., Executors, 355 Pa. 202, 49 A. 2d 374. Even if a contract to will the whole or part of an estate had been proved, and a breach shown, the measure of damages is the value of the services rendered and not the estate promised to be given: Graham v. Graham’s Executors, 34 Pa. 475; Neal’s Executors v. Gilmore, 79 Pa. 421; Mary Kauss v. John Rohner, 172 Pa. 481, 33 A. 1016; Byrne’s Estate, 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 413, 186 A. 187; Cramer v. McKinney et al., Executors, supra. No proof was submitted as to the extent of the service rendered and the value thereof.
The decree is affirmed at the cost of appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 A.2d 50, 359 Pa. 260, 1948 Pa. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-estate-pa-1948.