Jones, Elizabeth Renee v. Black's Mobile Detailing Service

2017 TN WC 128
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJune 30, 2017
Docket2016-03-0566
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 TN WC 128 (Jones, Elizabeth Renee v. Black's Mobile Detailing Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, Elizabeth Renee v. Black's Mobile Detailing Service, 2017 TN WC 128 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT KNOXVILLE

ELIZABETH RENEE JONES, ) Docket No.: 2016-03-0566 Employee, ) v. ) BLACK'S MOBILE DETAILING ) State File No.: 40660-2016 SERVICE, ) Employer. ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER GRANTING PAST TEMPORARY DISABILITY BENEFITS

This matter came before the undersigned Workers' Compensation Judge on June 20, 2017, upon Ms. Jones' Request for Expedited Hearing seeking temporary disability benefits. Previously, the Court conducted an Expedited Hearing and issued an order granting medical benefits. The Court incorporates by reference the facts and findings contained in that order.

The central legal issue before the Court at this time is whether Ms. Jones is likely to prevail at a trial on the merits in proving her entitlement to temporary disability benefits. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that Ms. Jones is and orders Black's Mobile Detailing to pay those benefits.

History of Claim 1

At the conclusion of the first Expedited Hearing in this matter, the Court held that Ms. Jones sustained an accidental injury to her left foot caused by a specific incident arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment and awarded medical benefits with Dr. Testerman as the authorized treating physician. However, the Court held that Ms. Jones failed to come forward with sufficient evidence to prove she would likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on the issue of temporary disability 1 In determining this claim, the Court takes judicial notice of testimony heard and exhibits admitted into evidence at the prior in-person Expedited Hearing. See Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453, 457 n.l (Tenn. 20 12)("we are permitted to take judicial notice of the facts from earlier proceedings in the same action").

1 benefits. In a renewed effort to obtain those benefits, Ms. Jones filed this second Request for Expedited Hearing and provided additional medical records.

At this hearing, Ms. Jones submitted additional treatment records. According to those records, on May 27, 2016, Dr. Testerman indicated Ms. Jones "may not return to work until6/21/16." On January 9, 2017, she noted, "the last time I saw her was 7/21/16. She was a no show to her 9/8/16 and 9/15116 appointments. She subsequently saw PA Barry Perkins, 9/23/16. [PA Perkins] released her to work." 2 Dr. Testerman additionally stated, "she can return to sedentary work for the next month . . . then return to regular activities," and signed a work status note indicating "[Ms. Jones] was not permitted to return to work from 5/27/16 to 9/29/16."

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

The following legal principles govern this case. Because this case is in a posture of an Expedited Hearing, Ms. Jones need not prove every element of her claim by a preponderance of the evidence in order to obtain relief. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). Instead, she must come forward with sufficient evidence from which this Court might determine she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. !d.; Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 239(d)(l) (2016).

Temporary Disability Benefits

Ms. Jones seeks temporary disability benefits. In Jones v. Crencor, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015), the Appeals Board, citing Simpson v. Satterfield, 564 S.W.2d 953, 955 (Tenn. 1978), held: "An injured worker is eligible for temporary disability benefits if: ( 1) the worker became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) there is a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the worker established the duration of the period of disability."

Here, Ms. Jones testified that she has been unable to work since the date of injury until she recently accepted a job at Rubbermaid. She introduced records from Dr. Testerman, which established she was unable to work from May 27 through September 29, 2016. To establish her rate of compensation for this time period, Ms. Jones submitted a wage statement that reflected an average weekly wage of $585.58 and a compensation rate of$389.99. Black's did not submit a wage statement.

Thus, the Court concludes that Ms. Jones has come forward with sufficient evidence to establish that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits on the issue of temporary disability benefits. The Court holds that she is entitled to 18 weeks of past

2 Ms. Jones did not submit the July 2 I or September 23, 2016 records into evidence.

2 temporary disability benefits from May 27 through September 29, 2016, in the amount of $7,019.82.

Payment of Benefits

Although this Court holds Black's must pay Ms. Jones past temporary disability benefits, it is unclear whether payment will be forthcoming, as Black's did not have workers' compensation insurance at the time of the accident. Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-802(e)(1) (2016), however, the Bureau has discretion to pay limited temporary disability and medical benefits from the Uninsured Employers Fund to employees who have established medical causation of their injury and meet the following criteria:

(1) The employee worked for an employer who failed to carry workers' compensation insurance; (2) The employee suffered an injury primarily arising in the course and scope of employment after July 1, 2015; (3) The employee was a Tennessee resident on the date of the injury; and, (4) The employee provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and the employer's failure to provide workers' compensation insurance no more than sixty days after the injury occurred.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-801(d)(1)-(4) (2016).

In the previously issued order, the Court adopted the findings contained in the Bureau's Investigation Report, admitted into evidence without objection as Exhibit 3. Based on the testimony and evidence introduced at the first Expedited Hearing, the Court found:

(1) Black's failed to carry workers' compensation insurance; (2) Ms. Jones suffered an injury arising primarily out of and in the course and scope of employment after July 1, 2015; (3) Ms. Jones was a Tennessee resident on May 23, 2016, the date of the injury; (4) Ms. Jones provided notice to the Bureau of the injury and Black's failure to provide workers' compensation within sixty days after the injury occurred; and, (5) Ms. Jones is entitled to past and on-going medical benefits.

Based on those findings, the Court holds Ms. Jones is qualified to receive temporary disability and medical benefits from the Uninsured Employers Fund, subject to the Fund's statutory discretion.

3 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Jones is entitled to past temporary disability benefits from May 27 through September 29, 2016, in the amount of$7,019.82.

2. Ms. Jones is eligible to receive medical and temporary disability benefits from the Uninsured Employer's Fund as allowed in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50- 6-801, et seq. Dr. Testerman will continue to be the authorized treating physician. The clerk shall forward a copy of this order to the Administrator for consideration of payment.

3. This matter is set for a Scheduling Hearing on August 21, 2017 at 9 a.m. Eastern.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Development Corporation
387 S.W.3d 453 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2012)
Simpson v. Satterfield
564 S.W.2d 953 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 TN WC 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-elizabeth-renee-v-blacks-mobile-detailing-service-tennworkcompcl-2017.