JONES-EL v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

JONES-EL v. State

188 S.W.3d 13, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2006 WL 9572

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 3, 2006

DocketED 86103

StatusPublished

This text of 188 S.W.3d 13 (JONES-EL v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JONES-EL v. State, 188 S.W.3d 13, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2006 WL 9572 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, E. Kenneth Jones-El (“Mov-ant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of robbery in the first degree (Count I), section 569.020, RSMo 2000, 1 armed criminal action (Count II), section 571.015, and unlawful use of a weapon (Count III), section 571.030. Mov-ant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to twenty years imprisonment for Count I, five years imprisonment for Count II, and five years imprisonment for Count III, with the sentences to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, E. Kenneth Jones-El (“Mov-ant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted of robbery in the first degree (Count I), section 569.020, RSMo 2000, 1 armed criminal action (Count II), section 571.015, and unlawful use of a weapon (Count III), section 571.030. Mov-ant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to twenty years imprisonment for Count I, five years imprisonment for Count II, and five years imprisonment for Count III, with the sentences to run consecutively. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.W.3d 13, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 9, 2006 WL 9572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-el-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack