Jones El v. Berry
This text of Jones El v. Berry (Jones El v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6666
ANDRE FLENNARD JONES EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STAN G. BERRY, Sheriff/Warden In Charge,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-05-218-2)
Submitted: August 12, 2005 Decided: September 7, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Flennard Jones El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Andre Flennard Jones El appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Jones El v. Berry, No. CA-05-218-2 (E.D. Va. filed
Apr. 14, 2005 & entered Apr. 15, 2005). We deny Jones El’s motion
for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jones El v. Berry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-el-v-berry-ca4-2005.