Jones, Davont v. Platinum Trucking

2019 TN WC 170
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedNovember 21, 2019
Docket2016-08-0437
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 170 (Jones, Davont v. Platinum Trucking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, Davont v. Platinum Trucking, 2019 TN WC 170 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS

DAVONT JONES ) Docket No. 2016-08-0437 Employee ) v. ) ) State File No. 29405-2016 PLATINUM TRUCKING, ) Uninsured Employer. ) ) Judge Deana Seymour

COMPENSATION HEARING ORDER

The Court convened a Compensation Hearing on October 23, 2019. The Court previously partially granted Mr. Jones’s Motion for Default Judgment and deemed his injury compensable. The remaining issues include Mr. Jones’s entitlement to medical, temporary disability, and permanent disability benefits. For the reasons below, the Court holds Mr. Jones is entitled to medical and temporary disability benefits but not permanent disability benefits.

History of Claim

While working as an over-the-road driver for Platinum Trucking, Mr. Jones injured both feet on July 19, 2015, after falling from his truck. 1 He sought emergency treatment, and his medical providers diagnosed him with bilateral heel fractures. Shortly afterward, he was transferred to another hospital.

After the hospital discharged him, Mr. Jones treated with Dr. Allison Whittle. Dr. Whittle restricted him for three months from any weight-bearing. Mr. Jones progressed from casts to 3D boots, and ASO braces to double upright braces. However, Mr. Jones used a motorized wheelchair due to significant pain.

1 Platinum Trucking did not have workers’ compensation insurance coverage at the time of Mr. Jones’s injury. However, since Mr. Jones did not reside in Tennessee on the date of his injury, he does not qualify for benefits under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-801(d).

1 On November 3, 2016, Dr. Whittle found Mr. Jones’s fractures stable, urged him to wean completely from his wheelchair, ordered additional physical therapy, and assigned no restrictions. In March 2018, Dr. Whittle released Mr. Jones from care and referred him to his primary care provider for a permanent disability assessment. According to Dr. Whittle, Mr. Jones continued to use his motorized wheelchair and complained of intense pain.

Dr. Whittle testified by deposition that Mr. Jones’s injury carries some impairment, but she did not calculate a rating. She also testified that Mr. Jones probably would not have been capable of working as a truck driver after he received weight- bearing clearance in October 2015. 2

Mr. Jones testified regarding his wages and inability to work after his injury. He stated Platinum Trucking paid him $1,200.00 to $1,400.00 weekly. He reported his injury to Platinum Trucking, which advised him to apply for disability benefits. According to Mr. Jones, he has not worked since his injury. He has a tenth-grade education and worked as an over-the-road driver for twenty years. He testified he can no longer drive because he cannot climb up into his truck or properly operate the pedals.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At a Compensation Hearing, Mr. Jones must establish entitlement to the requested benefits by a preponderance of the evidence. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2019).

Temporary Disability Benefits

To receive temporary total disability benefits, Mr. Jones must show (1) total disability from working as the result of a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the duration of the period of disability. Shepherd v. Haren Constr. Co., Inc., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 15, at *13 (Mar. 30, 2016). Since Mr. Jones submitted no medical proof that his providers took him off work, he is not entitled to these benefits.

However, Mr. Jones is eligible for temporary partial disability benefits if he earned less than his average weekly wage due to work restrictions. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 207(2)(A). The Court must consider the reasonableness of Platinum Trucking in attempting to return him to work and the reasonableness of Mr. Jones in failing to return to work. Lasser v. Waste Mgmt., Inc., 2018 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 20, at *14 (May 24, 2018).

2 Dr. Whittle also testified that the Regional One medical charges were reasonable and causally related to Mr. Jones’s fall from his truck. However, she noted the Regional One bill charged for three walker boots instead of two, which Dr. Whittle thought might be incorrect.

2 The unrebutted evidence shows that Platinum Trucking did not accommodate Mr. Jones’s restrictions. According to Mr. Jones, Platinum Trucking told him to apply for disability benefits, indicating its unwillingness to accommodate his restrictions. Mr. Jones’s medical records reflect he remained on restricted duty from July 19, 2015, until November 3, 2016, which entitles him to temporary partial disability benefits.

Since Platinum Trucking never filed a wage statement, the Court must rely on Mr. Jones’s testimony regarding his average weekly wage. 3 Mr. Jones earned between $1,200.00 and $1,400.00 per week when he worked for Platinum Trucking. The Court finds Mr. Jones’s average weekly wage is $1,300.00, resulting in a weekly compensation rate of $867.10. Therefore, Mr. Jones is entitled to temporary partial disability benefits totaling $58,591.19 for the period between July 19, 2015, and November 3, 2016.

Permanent Disability Benefits

Turning to Mr. Jones’s request for permanent partial disability benefits, the Court holds he failed to prove entitlement to these benefits. Mr. Jones failed to prove the extent of his permanent impairment. Dr. Whittle never calculated a rating. As the Appeals Board explained, “the method of calculating permanent partial disability as set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-207 is dependent on the existence of a rating. Thus, absent a permanent medical impairment rating, there is no statutory mechanism by which a trial court can award permanent partial disability benefits.” Baumgardner v. United Parcel Serv., 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 63, at *10-11 (Oct. 18, 2017). Without proof of an impairment rating, the Court denies Mr. Jones’s request for PPD benefits.

Regarding permanent total disability benefits, Tennessee law provides that, “[w]hen an injury not otherwise specifically provided for in this chapter totally incapacitates the employee from working at an occupation that brings the employee an income, the employee shall be considered totally disabled[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6- 207(4)(B). The assessment of PTD is based on numerous factors, including the employee’s skills and training, education, age, local job opportunities, and the capacity to work at the kinds of employment available in the disabled condition. Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co., 722 S.W.2d 380, 384 (Tenn. 1986). Although a rating of anatomical disability by a medical expert is one of the relevant factors, “the vocational disability is not restricted to the precise estimate of anatomical disability made by a medical witness.” Henson v. City of Lawrenceburg, 851 S.W.2d 809, 812 (Tenn. 1993). In addition, the

3 Mr. Jones asked the Court to award the maximum rate since Platinum Trucking failed to file a wage statement. However, in 2013, the legislature deleted subpart (c) of Tennessee Code Annotated section 50- 6-201, which allowed the maximum compensation rate to be used if the employer or insurer failed to file a wage statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McIlvain v. Russell Stover Candies, Inc.
996 S.W.2d 179 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1999)
Henson v. City of Lawrenceburg
851 S.W.2d 809 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1993)
Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co.
722 S.W.2d 380 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-davont-v-platinum-trucking-tennworkcompcl-2019.