Jones & Co. v. Middleton

29 Iowa 188
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Williams, J.

A note payable to order is transferable by indorsement after due, and is so far negotiable. We see no good reason for excusing the indorsee from making demand when the transfer is made in good faith. It is said that a note so transferred after due is, as respects the obligations of the parties, like a note payable on demand; and the same rule we think should hold that governs demand notes. 2 Parsons on Notes aud Bills, 13.

Demand should be made and notice given within a reasonable time, and demand and notice should be stated in the petition.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones & Co. v. Middleton, 29 Iowa 188 (iowa 1870).

29 Iowa 188 (Jones & Co. v. Middleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCrae v. Spires
113 S.E. 583 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
State v. Williford
86 S.W. 570 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Merrill v. City of St. Louis
83 Mo. 244 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Pryor v. Bowman
38 Iowa 92 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1874)
McKewer v. Kirtland
33 Iowa 348 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)