Jones & Co. v. Middleton

29 Iowa 188
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 29 Iowa 188 (Jones & Co. v. Middleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones & Co. v. Middleton, 29 Iowa 188 (iowa 1870).

Opinion

Williams, J.

A note payable to order is transferable by indorsement after due, and is so far negotiable. We see no good reason for excusing the indorsee from making demand when the transfer is made in good faith. It is said that a note so transferred after due is, as respects the obligations of the parties, like a note payable on demand; and the same rule we think should hold that governs demand notes. 2 Parsons on Notes aud Bills, 13.

Demand should be made and notice given within a reasonable time, and demand and notice should be stated in the petition.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCrae v. Spires
113 S.E. 583 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
State v. Williford
86 S.W. 570 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Merrill v. City of St. Louis
83 Mo. 244 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Pryor v. Bowman
38 Iowa 92 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1874)
McKewer v. Kirtland
33 Iowa 348 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Iowa 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-co-v-middleton-iowa-1870.