Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc.

401 F. App'x 802
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2010·No. No. 10-1479·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Arley T. Jones-Bey appeals the district court’s orders denying his civil action and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible erx-or. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc., No. 1:08-ev-03440-BEL (D. Md. Mar. 12 & Apr. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc., 401 F. App'x 802 (4th Cir. 2010).

401 F. App'x 802 (Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brayboy v. Robeson County Board of Education
181 L. Ed. 2d 106 (Supreme Court, 2011)