Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc.
This text of 401 F. App'x 802 (Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Arley T. Jones-Bey appeals the district court’s orders denying his civil action and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible erx-or. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones-Bey v. Tate Dodge Chrysler Jeep, Inc., No. 1:08-ev-03440-BEL (D. Md. Mar. 12 & Apr. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 F. App'x 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-bey-v-tate-dodge-chrysler-jeep-inc-ca4-2010.