Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
RHONDA A JONES-BELL : DOCKET NO. 2:22-cv-03855
VERSUS : JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR. IMPERIAL FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. : MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY
NOTICE AND ORDER
Defendant Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company filed a Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement [doc. 17] into the record. After review of the document, we find that Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company has failed to adequately allege its citizenship for purposes of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Specifically, instead of listing its own place of incorporation and principal place of business, Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company informed the court that it is a “wholly-owned subsidiary of National General Holdings Corp., which is a Delaware corporation.” Doc. 17. For diversity purposes, a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation and the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332; Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 130 S. Ct. 1181 (2010). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, on or before October 19, 2023, Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company is to amend its Diversity Jurisdiction Disclosure Statement [doc. 17] to use the proper method to allege its citizenship, i.e., Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Company’s state of incorporation and principal place of business.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this 17" day of October, 2023.
THLEEN UNITED STATES MAGIS TE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co (Jones-Bell v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.