Jones (Baron) Vs. Clark Cty. Sheriff

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJune 4, 2020
Docket81184
StatusPublished

This text of Jones (Baron) Vs. Clark Cty. Sheriff (Jones (Baron) Vs. Clark Cty. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones (Baron) Vs. Clark Cty. Sheriff, (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BARON MONTERO JONES, No. 81184 Petitioner, Vs. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF, Respondent. FILED JUN 0 4 2020 0.1.IZABETH A. BROWN OF S1JPREE COURr

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

This pro se petition for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus challenges the justice court's jurisdiction (based on the alleged issuance of a criminal complaint containing a blank, see NRS 4.320) and the justice court's probable cause determination (allegedly based on the medical records of someone else). Petitioner does not allege he previously sought and was denied habeas relief in the district court. See NRAP 22 (An application for an original writ of habeas corpus should be made to the appropriate district court" in the first instance.). Moreover, although petitioner provided two affidavits pertaining to some of his allegations, petitioner has not provided this court with any exhibits or other documentation supporting his claims for relief, including copies of the allegedly defective complaint and probable cause evidence. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

020-,2o122 "Petitioner( ] cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). We conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ is warranted. Further, to the extent that petitioner has counsel, he must proceed by and through his counsel of record. Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we deny the petition. It is so ORDERED.

Pidettuy ' C.J. Pickering

/1,...e....; J. Hardesty

A'aisCwO Stiglich

cc: Baron Montero Jones Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Sumeme Cower OF NEVADA

all I 947A Oglil. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones (Baron) Vs. Clark Cty. Sheriff, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-baron-vs-clark-cty-sheriff-nev-2020.