Jones, Aaron Randol

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 6, 2021
DocketWR-93,093-01
StatusPublished

This text of Jones, Aaron Randol (Jones, Aaron Randol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones, Aaron Randol, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-93,093-01

EX PARTE AARON RANDOL JONES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 10667-A IN THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT FROM GRAY COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant pled guilty to possession of child pornography and was sentenced to nine years’

imprisonment. He filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant claims his guilty plea was involuntary. He says that he was charged with several

offenses of possessing child pornography, that he pled guilty to the offenses for prison sentences, and

that, when he pled guilty, he believed the sentences would run concurrently, but they are not. He says

he has learned, upon making parole on one of the sentences, that the sentences were cumulated on

each other. He complains that counsel “did not explain my sentence to me correctly” and “did not

do his job for my defense.” 2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Morrow, 952 S.W.2d 530 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997). The habeas record forwarded to this Court contains no written plea agreement,

response from trial counsel, or findings from the trial court resolving the disputed factual issues.

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the

record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to

hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants

to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing.

See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall

immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

plea was involuntary. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate. The trial court shall supplement the habeas record with any written plea agreement.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and supplement the habeas

record with any written plea agreement, within ninety days from the date of this order. The district

clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and conclusions and the

record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions, objections,

proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from hearings and depositions. See TEX .

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested by the trial court and obtained from

this Court. 3

Filed: October 6, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Ex Parte Morrow
952 S.W.2d 530 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones, Aaron Randol, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-aaron-randol-texcrimapp-2021.