Jonathon Antwan Donaldson v. State
This text of Jonathon Antwan Donaldson v. State (Jonathon Antwan Donaldson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-02-0181-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
MAY 20, 2002 ______________________________
JONATHON ANTWAN DONALDSON
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _________________________________
FROM THE 209TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;
NO. 902,509; HON. MICHAEL McSPALDEN, PRESIDING _______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.
Appellant, Jonathon Antwon Donaldson, appeals from a judgment under which he
was convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine weighing more than 1 gram and
less than 4. The clerk’s record has been filed in this cause but the reporter’s record has
not. Furthermore, appellant, has filed a pro se “Petition to Dismiss” requesting the appeal
be withdrawn. However, the notice is not signed by appellant as required by Texas Rule
of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 209th District
Court of Harris County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court
shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing
to determine the following:
1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and,
2. whether appellant is indigent.
The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings
of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed
a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and
all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be
developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the
aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental
record with the clerk of this court on or before June 19, 2002. Should further time be
needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then an extension must be requested
before June 19, 2002. Furthermore, should appellant submit to this court a document
complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and evincing his decision to
withdraw his notice of appeal before the trial court convenes a hearing pursuant to this
order, then the appeal will be reinstated, and the court will act on the matter in due course.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jonathon Antwan Donaldson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathon-antwan-donaldson-v-state-texapp-2002.