Jonathan Woldense v. Ernica Ferdinand
This text of Jonathan Woldense v. Ernica Ferdinand (Jonathan Woldense v. Ernica Ferdinand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 9, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D24-1341 Lower Tribunal No. 24-6395-FC-04
Jonathan Woldense, Appellant,
vs.
Ernica Ferdinand, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Elisabeth Espinosa, Judge.
Jonathan Woldense, in proper person.
Ernica Ferdinand, in proper person.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Thomas v. Li, 391 So. 3d 453, 456 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)
(stating that the standard of review on appeal of an injunction for protection
against domestic violence is abuse of discretion); Applegate v. Barnett Bank
of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the
trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying
factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not
supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jonathan Woldense v. Ernica Ferdinand, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-woldense-v-ernica-ferdinand-fladistctapp-2025.