Jonathan Raunel Despaigne v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 26, 2024
Docket14-23-00904-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jonathan Raunel Despaigne v. the State of Texas (Jonathan Raunel Despaigne v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonathan Raunel Despaigne v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 26, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00904-CR

JONATHAN RAUNEL DESPAIGNE, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 185th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1720026

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon without an agreed recommendation. See Tex. Penal Code. Ann. § 22.02. Based on the guilty plea the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at 10 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. In accordance with the terms of a plea-bargain agreement, appellant waived his right to appeal in consideration of the State’s waiver of its right to a jury trial and dismissal of a third felony indictment against appellant. See Ex parte Broadway, 301 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (defendant may voluntarily waive right to appeal pursuant to plea bargain when sentencing is not agreed upon and defendant’s punishment is uncertain). The trial court signed a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). On January 19, 2024, this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. Appellant did not file a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ex Parte Broadway
301 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jonathan Raunel Despaigne v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-raunel-despaigne-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.