JONATHAN MICHAEL WAYTE vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JONATHAN MICHAEL WAYTE vs STATE OF FLORIDA (JONATHAN MICHAEL WAYTE vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JONATHAN MICHAEL WAYTE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-1251 LT Case No. 2021-MM-001653-A
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed December 30, 2022
Appeal from the County Court for Sumter County, Paul L. Militello, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 case, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand
for a corrected costs order that identifies the authority for each cost.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with INSTRUCTIONS.
WALLIS, EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JONATHAN MICHAEL WAYTE vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-michael-wayte-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.