Jonathan Mensing v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

99 A.3d 991, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 125, 2014 WL 4780802
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedSeptember 25, 2014
Docket2013-177-Appeal
StatusUnpublished

This text of 99 A.3d 991 (Jonathan Mensing v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonathan Mensing v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., 99 A.3d 991, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 125, 2014 WL 4780802 (R.I. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiffs, Jonathan Mensing and Laxmi Sundaram, appeal from a Superior Court summary judgment dismissing their claims against the defendants, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., OneWest Bank, FSB., and HSBC Bank USA, NA, as trustee for Deutsche Alt2006-AF1. This case came before the Supreme Court at a session in conference pursuant to Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure. At this time, we proceed to decide this case without further briefing and argument.

This appeal is not properly before the Court. Under “[Article I,] Rule 4(a) [of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure], a notice of appeal must be filed ‘within twenty (20) days of the date of the entry of the judgment.’ ” Iozzi v. City of Cranston, 52 A.3d 585, 588 (R.I.2012) (quoting Rule 4(a)). “It is well settled that ‘the time specified in Rule 4(a) is mandatory, and that once the prescribed time has *992 passed there can be no review by way of appeal.’ ” Id. (quoting Wachovia Bank v. Hershberger, 911 A.2d 278, 279-80 (R.I. 2006) (mem.)). Judgment in the instant case was entered on April 10, 2013 and the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal on May 7, 2013, more than twenty days thereafter. Thus, the plaintiffs’ notice of appeal was untimely, and this case must be dismissed.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ appeal is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wachovia Bank v. Hershberger
911 A.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2006)
Iozzi v. City of Cranston
52 A.3d 585 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 A.3d 991, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 125, 2014 WL 4780802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-mensing-v-mortgage-electronic-registration-systems-inc-ri-2014.