JONATHAN M. DANIELS vs STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 21, 2022
Docket22-1685
StatusPublished

This text of JONATHAN M. DANIELS vs STATE OF FLORIDA (JONATHAN M. DANIELS vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JONATHAN M. DANIELS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

JONATHAN M. DANIELS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D22-1685 LT Case No. 2008-CF-5141-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ________________________________/

Opinion filed October 21, 2022

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Jonathan M. Daniels, Bushnell, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This Court previously denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas

corpus. Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his

abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his

judgment and sentence in Marion County Fifth Judicial Circuit Court Case

Number 2008-CF-5141-A, this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to

show cause why he should not be prohibited from future pro se filings.

See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). Petitioner failed to respond to our order. We conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and

should be barred from further pro se filings.

In order to conserve judicial resources, Petitioner is prohibited from

filing with this Court any further pro se filings concerning his conviction and

sentence imposed in Marion County case number 2008-CF-5141-A. The

Clerk of this Court is directed to not accept any filings in this case unless they

are signed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. See Isley v.

State, 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough”). The

Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the

appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See §

944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2022); Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla.

5th DCA 2005).

SANCTIONS IMPOSED. PETITIONER PROHIBITED FROM

FUTURE FILINGS.

EVANDER, WALLIS AND EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Isley v. State
652 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Simpkins v. State
909 So. 2d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JONATHAN M. DANIELS vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-m-daniels-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.