Jonathan Jay Rodriguez v. State
This text of Jonathan Jay Rodriguez v. State (Jonathan Jay Rodriguez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 15, 2016
No. 04-16-00510-CR
Jonathan Jay RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015CR5254 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding
ORDER Defendant pled guilty to sexual assault and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a general notice of appeal. The trial court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal states this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that defendant’s case is a plea bargain case and defendant does not have a right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).
“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record does not contain a written motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
It is therefore ORDERED this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification that shows defendant has the right of appeal has been made part of the appellate record by September 14, 2016. See Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the certification issue.
_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of August, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jonathan Jay Rodriguez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-jay-rodriguez-v-state-texapp-2016.