Jonathan Demond Crews v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2014
Docket05-14-00051-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jonathan Demond Crews v. State (Jonathan Demond Crews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonathan Demond Crews v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order entered July 31, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00051-CR

JONATHAN DEMOND CREWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F13-56357-M

ORDER The reporter’s record is overdue in this appeal. Additionally, the clerk’s record does not

contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal, which is required in every

case in which the defendant is appealing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 420

S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding the

following.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court finds that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, the trial court shall next prepare a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.  The trial court shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact,

any supporting documentation, the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal, and

any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cortez, Damien Hernandez
420 S.W.3d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jonathan Demond Crews v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-demond-crews-v-state-texapp-2014.