Jonathan Bradshaw v. State
This text of Jonathan Bradshaw v. State (Jonathan Bradshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Jonathan Bradshaw v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-19-00611-CR
Trial court case number: 18-DCR-080889
Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County
Appellant, Jonathan Bradshaw, has filed a motion to suspend the briefing schedule until the court reporter files a supplemental reporter’s record transcribing 911 calls that were played at appellant’s jury trial but not transcribed in the trial record. The Court construes this motion as a motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d) (supplementation of reporter’s record). Appellee, the State of Texas, did not file a response to appellant’s motion, and ten days have passed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). Appellant filed his brief on January 9, 2020, before the Court ruled on appellant’s motion. Appellant’s briefing deadline was January 27, 2020. Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __January 16, 2020___
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jonathan Bradshaw v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonathan-bradshaw-v-state-texapp-2020.