Jonathan Andrew Hart v. Warden Robert Adams, et al.

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION

JONATHAN ANDREW HART, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 6:24-ev-53 v. WARDEN ROBERT ADAMS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation for the Court to grant Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and to dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint. Doc. 64. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has elapsed. Upon review, I find no clear error in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and ADOPT the Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006) (If no specific objections are made or no objections are made at all, “the appropriate standard of review for the report and recommendation is clear error.”). [GRANT Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, docs. 35,50, DISMISS Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, doc. 13, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. SO ORDERED, this ee day of September, 2026.

ET 7 4] oe \ Nie sf J. RANDAL HALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA