Jonas v. Long Island Railroad
20 Misc. 176, 45 N.Y.S. 1142
Opinion
We think the evidence above "shows that the plaintiff was guilty of. contributory negligence.
He had no right to take the place occupied by him while the defendant’s train was going at a high rate of" speed. . The complaint was dismissed because of the plaintiff’s, negligence and rightfully so, we think, and, therefore, judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Present: Van Wyck, Ch. J., and Fitzsimons, J.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. " ..... ■ •
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jonas v. Long Island Railroad, 20 Misc. 176, 45 N.Y.S. 1142 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).
20 Misc. 176 (Jonas v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sias v. Rochester Railway Co.
18 A.D. 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)