Jonas v. Landau

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jonas v. Landau

679 So. 2d 20, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8045, 1996 WL 426423

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 31, 1996

DocketNo. 96-308

StatusPublished

This text of 679 So. 2d 20 (Jonas v. Landau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jonas v. Landau, 679 So. 2d 20, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8045, 1996 WL 426423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jonas, an architect, appeals from an order dismissing Count I of his three count complaint. Each of the three counts seeks the same damages for the same services against the same defendants based on separate legal theories, respectively the imposition of a construction lien (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), and unjust enrichment (Count III). Because Counts II and III remain pending below, it is obvious that the dismissal of Count I is not appealable at this time. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Assoc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974); Roper v. Wilcox, 596 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lavey v. Tattoli, 491 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); One Thousand Oaks, Inc. v. Dade Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 417 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jonas, an architect, appeals from an order dismissing Count I of his three count complaint. Each of the three counts seeks the same damages for the same services against the same defendants based on separate legal theories, respectively the imposition of a construction lien (Count I), breach of contract (Count II), and unjust enrichment (Count III). Because Counts II and III remain pending below, it is obvious that the dismissal of Count I is not appealable at this time. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Assoc., 303 So.2d 1 (Fla.1974); Roper v. Wilcox, 596 So.2d 532 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Lavey v. Tattoli, 491 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); One Thousand Oaks, Inc. v. Dade Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 417 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

679 So. 2d 20, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8045, 1996 WL 426423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonas-v-landau-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack