Jonas v. Feist

5 N.Y.S. 436, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3026

This text of 5 N.Y.S. 436 (Jonas v. Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jonas v. Feist, 5 N.Y.S. 436, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3026 (superctny 1889).

Opinion

Dugro, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a-jury. Errors of law arising on exceptions taken at the trial are therefore-alone before the court for consideration. The only exception which appears in the case is one to an order denying a motion for a new trial. Such an exception is not, therefore, available for any purpose. On trials by jury the-only subjects for exceptions are rulings at the trial. The motion for a new trial is a proceeding subsequent to the trial, and an order made on such motion is reviewable only by appeal. Boos v. Insurance Co., 64 N. Y. 236; Thurber v. Railroad Co., 60 N. Y. 326. The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Tbuax, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boos v. . World Mutual Life Insurance Co.
64 N.Y. 236 (New York Court of Appeals, 1876)
Thurber v. . Harlem B., M. F.R.R. Co.
60 N.Y. 326 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.Y.S. 436, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jonas-v-feist-superctny-1889.