Jonas v. Feist

The Superior Court of New York City

Jonas v. Feist

24 Jones & S. 578, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 628, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedApril 15, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 24 Jones & S. 578 (Jonas v. Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jonas v. Feist, 24 Jones & S. 578, 23 N.Y. St. Rep. 628, 56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.—Dugro, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict of a jury.

Errors of law arising on exceptions taken at the trial are therefore alone before this court for consideration.

The only exception which appears in the case is one to an order denying a motion for a new trial. Such an exception is not available for any purpose.

On trials by jury the only subjects for exceptions are rulings at the trial.

The motion for a new trial is a proceeding subsequent to the trial, and an order made on such motion is reviewable only by appeal. Boos v. World Mutual Life Ins. Co., 64 N. Y. 236; Thurber v. Harlem B. M. & F. R.R Co., 60 Ib. 326.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Truax J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI