Jon v. Washington Mutual Bank

Fourth Circuit

Jon v. Washington Mutual Bank

300 F. App'x 210

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 18, 2008·No. No. 08-1701·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Siddi Jon appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil actions related to the foreclosure action that culminated in the sale of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jon’s motion for default judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jon v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 1:08-cv-00632-JFM, 2008 WL 2126245 (D.Md. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Siddi Jon appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil actions related to the foreclosure action that culminated in the sale of her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jon’s motion for default judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jon v. Washington Mut. Bank, No. 1:08-cv-00632-JFM, 2008 WL 2126245 (D.Md. May 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jon v. Washington Mutual Bank, 300 F. App'x 210 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

300 F. App'x 210 (Jon v. Washington Mutual Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.