Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2019
Docket07-19-00189-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. State (Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-19-00189-CR ________________________

JON SANTOS DELGADO-GORDON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 73,211-D; Honorable Pamela Cook Sirmon, Presiding

June 13, 2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ.

Appellant, Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon, attempts to appeal the trial court’s order

dismissing his post-conviction motion for discovery for want of jurisdiction. We likewise

dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction. In 2017, pursuant to an open plea of guilty, Appellant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to sixty-five years confinement.1 Appellant did not appeal his conviction. In

January of 2019, Appellant filed a Motion of Discovery pursuant to article 39.14 of the

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking all documents and items in the State’s

possession concerning his criminal case. The trial court signed an order dismissing the

motion for want of jurisdiction and Appellant appealed the order.

Generally, we have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only

from a final judgment of conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West

2018); Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 697 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). We do not have

jurisdiction to review a trial court’s orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly

granted by statute. Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). See

also TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2) (providing that a criminal defendant has the right to appeal

a judgment of guilt or other appealable order).

The trial court’s order dismissing Appellant’s motion for discovery pursuant to

article 39.14 is neither a judgment of conviction nor an order appealable by statute. See

Bibbs v. State, No. 02-18-00391-CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 9192, at *2 (Tex. App.—Fort

Worth Nov. 8, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal

from trial court’s denial of article 39.14 motion for discovery for want of jurisdiction).

Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction to review the order.

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 19.02(b)(3) (West 2019).

2 Because Appellant has failed to properly invoke the jurisdiction of this court, we

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.2

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

2 Appellant may be entitled to relief, however, by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal from his criminal conviction. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Ragston, Joshua Dewayne
424 S.W.3d 49 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jon Santos Delgado-Gordon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jon-santos-delgado-gordon-v-state-texapp-2019.