Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 9, 2023
Docket8:22-cv-01777
StatusUnknown

This text of Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

Case 8:22-cv-01777-JWH-JDE Document 14 Filed 01/09/23 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:107

5 6

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 JON LEVIN, ) Case No. 8:22-cv-01777 JWH (JDEx) ) 12 ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. John D. Early ) 14 v. ) STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ) ORDER 15 ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ) 16 ) ) 17 Defendant. ) ) 18

19 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation (Dkt. 13) and for good cause shown, the 20 Court finds and orders as follow. 21 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 22 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 23 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 24 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be 25 warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 26 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 27 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 28 -1- Case 8:22-cv-01777-JWH-JDE Document 14 Filed 01/09/23 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:108

1 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 2 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 3 under the applicable legal principles. 4 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 5 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 6 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 7 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 8 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 9 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 10 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 11 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 12 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 13 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may 14 be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, 15 court rules, case decisions, or common law. Specifically, Wells Fargo is expected 16 to produce specific loan information from its customers as part of this litigation. 17 That information contains private information from third parties regarding their 18 loans from Wells Fargo. Moreover, Wells Fargo expects to produce its loan notes 19 related to loans that Plaintiff originated or from other putative class members. 20 Those notes contain confidential customer data and information. The disclosure of 21 this information would infringe on third parties’ privacy rights and potentially 22 23 undermine Wells Fargo’s competitive advantage in the marketplace. 24 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 25 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 26 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 27 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 28 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and -2- Case 8:22-cv-01777-JWH-JDE Document 14 Filed 01/09/23 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:109

1 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 2 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 3 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 4 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and 5 there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 6 3. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF UNDER SEAL FILING 7 PROCEDURE 8 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.3, below, that this 9 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 10 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 11 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court 12 to file material under seal. There is a strong presumption that the public has a right 13 of access to judicial proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non- 14 dispositive motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See 15 Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), 16 Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar- 17 Welbon v. Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even 18 stipulated protective orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of 19 good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal 20 justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to 21 file under seal. The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material 22 23 as CONFIDENTIAL does not— without the submission of competent evidence by 24 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 25 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 26 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, 27 then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and 28 the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be -3- Case 8:22-cv-01777-JWH-JDE Document 14 Filed 01/09/23 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:110

1 protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n., 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed 3 or introduced under seal, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling 4 reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing 5 order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents 6 under seal must be provided by declaration. 7 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable 8 in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be 9 redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, 10 omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the 11 document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in 12 their entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 13 4. DEFINITIONS 14 4.1 Action: the action Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 22- 15 cv-01777 JWH (JDEx), originally filed on August 11, 2022 in the California 16 Superior Court, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2022-01274813-CU-0E-CXC, and 17 removed to this Court on September 28, 2022. 18 4.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 19 designation of information or items under this Order. 20 4.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 21 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 22 23 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 24 the Good Cause Statement. 25 4.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 26 their support staff). 27 / / / 28 / / / -4- Case 8:22-cv-01777-JWH-JDE Document 14 Filed 01/09/23 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:111

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Makar-Wellbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 576 (E.D. Wisconsin, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jon Levin v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jon-levin-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-cacd-2023.