Jon F. And Constance M. Hartung v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

484 F.2d 953
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 26, 1973·No. 71-1611·Published

Opinion

484 F.2d 953

73-2 USTC P 9616

Jon F. and Constance M. HARTUNG, Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 71-1611.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1973.
Rehearing Denied Oct. 26, 1973.

Fred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), Scott P. Crampton, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, K. Martin Worthy, IRS Chief Counsel, Meyer T. Rothwacks, Harry Baum, William K. Hogan, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellant.

Jon F. Hartung, in pro per.

Joseph H. Guttentag, of Surrey, Karasik & Morse, Washington, D. C., for amici curiae.

Before CHAMBERS and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and SKOPIL,* District Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The decision of the Tax Court is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Sterrett, Hartung v. Commissioner, 1970, 55 T.C. 1, 5.

*

The Honorable Otto R. Skopil, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jon F. And Constance M. Hartung v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 484 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1973).

484 F.2d 953 (Jon F. And Constance M. Hartung v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartung v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 1 (U.S. Tax Court, 1970)
Hartung v. Commissioner
484 F.2d 953 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)