Jon Barri Bros. v. State

106 So. 3d 1010, 2013 WL 615484, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 2013·No. No. 3D12-478·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Walker v. State, 682 So.2d 555 (Fla.1996). See also Buchman v. Canard, 926 So.2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (noting that doctrine of law of the case applies to a per curiam decision of the appellate courts); Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that “[a] per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court’s opinion or not” (quoting Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So.2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jon Barri Bros. v. State, 106 So. 3d 1010, 2013 WL 615484, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

106 So. 3d 1010 (Jon Barri Bros. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. State
682 So. 2d 555 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher
656 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Bueno v. De KHAWLY
677 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Buchman v. Canard
926 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)