Jon Barri Bros. v. State

106 So. 3d 1010, 2013 WL 615484, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2013
DocketNo. 3D12-478
StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 3d 1010 (Jon Barri Bros. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jon Barri Bros. v. State, 106 So. 3d 1010, 2013 WL 615484, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Walker v. State, 682 So.2d 555 (Fla.1996). See also Buchman v. Canard, 926 So.2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (noting that doctrine of law of the case applies to a per curiam decision of the appellate courts); Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that “[a] per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court’s opinion or not” (quoting Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So.2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995))).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. State
682 So. 2d 555 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher
656 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Bueno v. De KHAWLY
677 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Buchman v. Canard
926 So. 2d 390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 So. 3d 1010, 2013 WL 615484, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jon-barri-bros-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.