Jomar Bakery Corp. v. Pergament United Sales, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jomar Bakery Corp. v. Pergament United Sales, Inc.

117 A.D.2d 714, 499 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52991

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 714 (Jomar Bakery Corp. v. Pergament United Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jomar Bakery Corp. v. Pergament United Sales, Inc., 117 A.D.2d 714, 499 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated October 22, 1984, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (c).

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term correctly concluded that issues of fact exist with regard to whether the plaintiff executed an agreement dated April 6, 1984, as the result of economic duress. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roberto, J.), dated October 22, 1984, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (c).

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Special Term correctly concluded that issues of fact exist with regard to whether the plaintiff executed an agreement dated April 6, 1984, as the result of economic duress. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 714, 499 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jomar-bakery-corp-v-pergament-united-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1986.