Jolly v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jolly v. State

756 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001, 2000 WL 232621

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2000

DocketNo. 4D98-4317

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 756 So. 2d 142 (Jolly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jolly v. State, 756 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2001, 2000 WL 232621 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION

SHAHOOD, J.

We grant appellee’s Motion for Rehearing and Clarification, withdraw our opinion filed January 5, 2000, and substitute the following opinion in its place.

We affirm appellant’s revocation of probation. The fact that the misdemeanor charge of possession of cannabis was dismissed by the county court is of no consequence because the order of probation states that appellant shall not “violate any law of any city, county, state, or the United States (a conviction in a court of law is not necessary for you to be found in violation).”

[143]*143The filing of the 3.800(b) motion by appellant, pro se, after the filing of the notice of appeal, has no effect on any further remedies appellant may have pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Affirmed.

FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI