Jolliff v. State

665 S.W.2d 66
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 17, 1984
DocketNo. 47187
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 665 S.W.2d 66 (Jolliff v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jolliff v. State, 665 S.W.2d 66 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Appeal from summary denial of movant-defendant’s Rule 27.26 motion. He challenges the 20-year persistent-offender sentence imposed on his plea of not guilty to second-degree robbery. See 638 S.W.2d 802 (Mo.App.1982).

Defendant’s only ground here is that his sentence exceeded the ten years received by his accomplice on a guilty plea. That is irrelevant.

We presume the validity of legislatively prescribed punishment. State v. Higgins, 592 S.W.2d 151[2, 3] (Mo. banc 1979) and Parton v. State, 545 S.W.2d 338[14-16] (Mo.App.1976).

Affirmed.

KAROHL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRANDALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
738 S.W.2d 478 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)
Neal v. State
703 S.W.2d 570 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
665 S.W.2d 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jolliff-v-state-moctapp-1984.