Jolley v. Vinton
This text of 157 A.3d 755 (Jolley v. Vinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*567The plaintiff, Carlton Jolley, appeals to this court claiming that the trial court improperly granted the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, Captain Brian Vinton and Attorney General George Jepsen, based on statutory and sovereign immunity. The defendants claim that the court correctly granted the motion to dismiss with respect to Jepsen, but concede that the court should not have granted the motion to dismiss with respect to Vinton. After a careful review of the briefs to this court and the record, and in light of the defendants' concession, we agree with the defendants.
The judgment of dismissal as to Vinton is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings *568according to law. The judgment is affirmed in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.3d 755, 171 Conn. App. 567, 2017 Conn. App. LEXIS 75, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jolley-v-vinton-connappct-2017.