JOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
This text of JOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (JOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
WILLIAM B. JOLLEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 1:20-cv-3216-JMS-MJD ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) BEN CARSON, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
Pro se Plaintiff William B. Jolley files this action against the United States and Ben Carson, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). [Filing No. 1.] Liberally construed, the Complaint alleges, in relevant part, that Mr. Jolley was denied employment with HUD because of his hearing disability, his "advanced age," and because he has successfully litigated employment discrimination claims to protect his and other veterans' rights under the Uniformed Service Employment and Reemployment Act ("USERRA") and other laws. [Filing No. 1 at 2-3; Filing No. 1 at 5.] He also asserts that the portions of USERRA that apply to veterans employed by the federal government are unconstitutional. [Filing No. 1 at 4-5.] Mr. Jolley states that is a veteran of the United States Air Force and that he is now deaf as a result of his military service. [Filing No. 1 at 2; Filing No. 2 at 2.] Mr. Jolley has filed a "Motion to Proceed as a Veteran Without Payment of Court Fees and Charges." [Filing No. 2.] In the motion, he asks the Court to order that he be allowed to proceed with this action without payment of fees and charges under USERRA, 38 U.S.C. § 4323(h)(1), which provides: "No fees or court costs may be charged or taxed against any person claiming rights under this chapter." "In light of the plain language of 38 U.S.C. § 4323(h)(1) and Congress's intent, in USERRA and elsewhere, to lessen the costs of litigation for veterans, [the Seventh Circuit has held] that 38 U.S.C. § 4323(h)(1) permits a USERRA litigant to initiate suit without prepaying the filing fee." Davis v. Advocate Health Ctr. Patient Care Exp., 523 F.3d 681,685 (7th Cir. 2008) (refunding entire appellate filing fee); see also Palumbo v. Devry Univ., 964 F. Supp. 2d 935, 937 (N.D. Ill. 2013) (granting plaintiff's motion to waive the filing fee under to 38 U.S.C. § 4323(h)(1)); Maclver v. City of Lakeland, Fla., 2013 WL 3818111, at *1 (M.D. Fla. July 17, 2013) (allowing USERRA plaintiff to proceed "without paying a filing fee"). Accordingly, because the Court finds that (1) Mr. Jolley is a veteran and (2) he asserts claims under USERRA, Mr. Jolley's Motion, [2], is GRANTED and he may proceed without payment of the filing fee.
Date: 12/21/2020 Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge ‘United States District Court Southern District of Indiana
Distribution via U.S. Mail to: William B. Jolley 73 Bartram Trail Brunswick, GA 31523
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOLLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jolley-v-united-states-of-america-insd-2020.