Joleewu, Ltd. v. City of Austin

934 F.2d 621, 1991 WL 100568
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 24, 1991·No. 90-8149·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion November 11, 1990, 5th Cir. 916 F.2d 250)

Before JONES, DUHÉ and WEINER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that appellant’s motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing out of time is granted to the extent herewith explained.

Joleewu, Ltd., asks us to reconsider that portion of our prior opinion which affirmed the dismissal of its claim against the City of Austin founded on Tex.Bus.Comm.Code § 27.01, covering fraud in real estate transactions. When the opinion was issued, no Texas cases had considered whether municipalities were immune from suit under this law, but a Texas court of appeals decision rendered shortly afterward suggested that immunity may not be a defense. Kerrville HRH, Inc. v. City of Kerrville, 803 S.W.2d 377, 382-83 (Tex.Ct.App.1990). Because we already have decided to remand this case, and our decision on sovereign immunity now appears open to question under Texas law, we VACATE that portion of our earlier opinion construing § 27.01 and REMAND that issue for further consideration by the trial court. Our prior ruling and judgment are otherwise unchanged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joleewu, Ltd. v. City of Austin, 934 F.2d 621, 1991 WL 100568 (5th Cir. 1991).

934 F.2d 621 (Joleewu, Ltd. v. City of Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority v. Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C.
176 P.3d 737 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2007)
Cornerstone Group XXII, L.L.C. v. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority
151 P.3d 601 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2006)