Jokinen v. State

588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1991 WL 253831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 1991·No. No. 91-0272·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plea herein having been based upon a failure of communication or misunderstanding, it was involuntary. See Ryals v. State, 516 So.2d 1092, 1093 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial upon the merits.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jokinen v. State, 588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1991 WL 253831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

588 So. 2d 1098 (Jokinen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ryals v. State
516 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)