Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jokinen v. State

Jokinen v. State

588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1991 WL 253831
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 4, 1991
DocketNo. 91-0272
StatusPublished

This text of 588 So. 2d 1098 (Jokinen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jokinen v. State, 588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1991 WL 253831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plea herein having been based upon a failure of communication or misunderstanding, it was involuntary. See Ryals v. State, 516 So.2d 1092, 1093 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for trial upon the merits.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryals v. State
516 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 So. 2d 1098, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029, 1991 WL 253831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jokinen-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.