Joint Venture Asset Acquisition v. Tufano

203 A.D.2d 102, 610 N.Y.S.2d 37
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 12, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carmen Beauchamp Ciparick, J.) entered March 8, 1993, which awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $187,248.99, inclusive of interest and costs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court correctly granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant-appellant’s belated assertions that his signature on the promissory note was forged and that he was in Texas at the time the note was executed amount to mere conclusory statements, unsubstantiated in the record, which are not sufficient to defeat plaintiff’s prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment (Ehrlich v American Moninger Greenhouse Mfg. Corp., 26 NY2d 255, 259). Concur— Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joint Venture Asset Acquisition v. Tufano, 203 A.D.2d 102, 610 N.Y.S.2d 37 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 102 (Joint Venture Asset Acquisition v. Tufano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Silver v. Silver
17 A.D.3d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
DDS Partners, LLC v. Celenza
6 A.D.3d 347 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Moezinia v. Baroukhian
247 A.D.2d 452 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Salrex Investments, Inc. v. M. Slavin & Sons, Inc.
214 A.D.2d 399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)