Joiner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joiner v. State

115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 363, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 4

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 10, 1923·No. 14005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. “ Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a. portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitteá.” City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3), 698 (92 S. E. 28); Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (1), 176 (106 S. E. 199), and citations. Under this ruling the only special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit.

2. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. “ Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a. portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitteá.” City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3), 698 (92 S. E. 28); Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (1), 176 (106 S. E. 199), and citations. Under this ruling the only special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit.

2. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Joiner v. State, 115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 363, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 4 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

115 S.E. 278 (Joiner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related