Joiner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joiner v. State

115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 363, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 4

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 10, 1923

Docket14005

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 115 S.E. 278 (Joiner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joiner v. State, 115 S.E. 278, 29 Ga. App. 363, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 4 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. “ Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a. portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitteá.” City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3), 698 (92 S. E. 28); Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (1), 176 (106 S. E. 199), and citations. Under this ruling the only special ground of the motion for a new trial is without merit.

2. The evidence authorized the defendant’s conviction, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI