Joiner v. State

46 S.E. 412, 119 Ga. 315, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 822
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

1. Evidence of a third party as to statements of a wife that her husband had just beaten her, made in the presence of the husband without denial on his part and under such circumstances that his silence amounted to an admission, is admissible on the trial of the husband for wife-beating, although the wife declines to testify at the trial against her husband. Knight v. State, 114 Ga. 48.

2. While it is true that one accused of crime can not be convicted upon his confessions alone, yet if on the trial of one charged with wife-beating it is shown that he and his wife had been together in his house, that the wife had run crying from the house, called a policeman, and showed him a swollen eye and a bow-l of bloody water in which she had bathed her nose, the jury may properly regard this as sufficient corroboration of the husband’s confession to show the corpus delicti and to justify a conviction. Penal Code, § 1005, and cases cited. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joiner v. State, 46 S.E. 412, 119 Ga. 315, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 822 (Ga. 1904).

46 S.E. 412 (Joiner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. State
50 S.E.2d 709 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
People v. Leary
172 P.2d 41 (California Supreme Court, 1946)
Norton v. State
34 S.E.2d 669 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
Logue v. State
32 S.E.2d 397 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Mason v. State
1937 OK CR 28 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1937)
Fortenberry v. State
165 S.E. 215 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Bowen v. State
137 S.E. 793 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Coggeshall v. State
131 S.E. 57 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Cocroft v. Cocroft
124 S.E. 346 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Pappenburg v. State
65 So. 418 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)