Joiner v. General Electric Co.
This text of 134 F.3d 1457 (Joiner v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 15,1997, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the panel in this case reversing the district court’s exclusion of plaintiffs expert testimony and grant of summary judgment. General Electric Co. v. Joiner, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 512, 139 L.Ed.2d 508 (1997). However, the Supreme Court noted that genuine issues of material fact still preclude summary judgment in this case. Specifically, the Supreme Court stated that:
Whether Joiner was exposed to furans and dioxins, and whether if there was such exposure, the opinions of Joiner’s experts would then be admissible, remain open questions. We accordingly reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand this ease for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Id. at-, 118 S.Ct. at 519.
Accordingly, we REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision and order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 F.3d 1457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joiner-v-general-electric-co-ca11-1998.