JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 2022·No. 22-1435·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1435 LT Case No. 2020-305477-CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, James R. Clayton, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentences imposed by the trial court with one exception. We remand for the court to correct an error in the final judgment assessing costs to show that the $100 cost of investigation is payable to the Daytona Beach Police Department, as orally pronounced by the trial court during sentencing and as agreed to by Appellant. The current cost judgment inadvertently reflects that this assessment is owed to the Volusia County Sheriff’s Office.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to enter a corrected final judgment for costs.

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA (JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)