JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA (JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-1435 LT Case No. 2020-305477-CFDB
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ________________________________/
Opinion filed December 2, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, James R. Clayton, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentences imposed
by the trial court with one exception. We remand for the court to correct an
error in the final judgment assessing costs to show that the $100 cost of
investigation is payable to the Daytona Beach Police Department, as orally
pronounced by the trial court during sentencing and as agreed to by
Appellant. The current cost judgment inadvertently reflects that this
assessment is owed to the Volusia County Sheriff’s Office.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to enter a corrected final judgment for costs.
LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOHNTEL DUWAYNE BOLDEN vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johntel-duwayne-bolden-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.