Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

248 A.D. 675
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 675 (Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 248 A.D. 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. (See Eaton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 231 App. Div. 876; Cook v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 244 id. 63; affd., 268 N. Y. 599.) All concur. (The judgment of the Supreme Court affirmed a Buffalo City Court judgment for damages for personal injuries caused by slipping on store floor.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
198 N.E. 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Eaton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
231 A.D. 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnstone-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1936.