Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
248 A.D. 675
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. (See Eaton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 231 App. Div. 876; Cook v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 244 id. 63; affd., 268 N. Y. 599.) All concur. (The judgment of the Supreme Court affirmed a Buffalo City Court judgment for damages for personal injuries caused by slipping on store floor.) Present — Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 248 A.D. 675 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 675 (Johnstone v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cook v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
198 N.E. 423 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
Eaton v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
231 A.D. 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)