Johnston v. Wooding

4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160, 1902 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 234
CourtHamilton Circuit Court
DecidedDecember 23, 1902
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160 (Johnston v. Wooding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Wooding, 4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160, 1902 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 234 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1902).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

"Whatever of doubt there may be as to the nature of things in dispute herein, whether or not they are fixtures, is resolved in favor of the landlord by reason of the fact that they were not removed during the term of tenancy or within a reasonable time thereafter.

Decree for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160, 1902 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-wooding-ohcircthamilton-1902.