Johnston v. Wooding

4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160, 1902 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 234
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided December 23, 1902·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

"Whatever of doubt there may be as to the nature of things in dispute herein, whether or not they are fixtures, is resolved in favor of the landlord by reason of the fact that they were not removed during the term of tenancy or within a reasonable time thereafter.

Decree for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnston v. Wooding, 4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160, 1902 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 234 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1902).

4 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 160 (Johnston v. Wooding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.