Johnston v. State
877 S.W.2d 166, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 820, 1994 WL 199675
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnston v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1046 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Keith E. Johnston, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnston v. State, 877 S.W.2d 166, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 820, 1994 WL 199675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
877 S.W.2d 166 (Johnston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.