Johnston v. State

866 So. 2d 1253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1333, 2004 WL 384767
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 2004
DocketNo. 4D03-4547
StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 1253 (Johnston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. State, 866 So. 2d 1253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1333, 2004 WL 384767 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without prejudice to appellant filing a legally sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion addressing any alleged entitlement to additional jail credit. See Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(citing State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla.1998)).

FARMER, C.J., STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Toro v. State
719 So. 2d 947 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 1253, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1333, 2004 WL 384767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.