Johnston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johnston v. State

716 So. 2d 295, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1998 WL 412655

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 1998

DocketNo. 97-856

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 716 So. 2d 295 (Johnston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnston v. State, 716 So. 2d 295, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1998 WL 412655 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences, but remand for correction of the judgment entered by the trial court. The appellant was properly sentenced as a capital offender, and his offenses should be specifically classified as capital offenses. We therefore remand for the correction of the judgment that incorrectly classified the offenses as “FL,” apparently meaning “Felony Life.”

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences, but remand for correction of the judgment entered by the trial court. The appellant was properly sentenced as a capital offender, and his offenses should be specifically classified as capital offenses. We therefore remand for the correction of the judgment that incorrectly classified the offenses as “FL,” apparently meaning “Felony Life.”

AFFIRMED in part; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 So. 2d 295, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9455, 1998 WL 412655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack