Johnston v. Preer
This text of 51 Ga. 313 (Johnston v. Preer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Were the allegations here to the effect that the assols divided were cash, and the mistake against the complainant a .cash item, I am not clear that the bill against one of the partners would not be good, though in this ease, perhaps, an action at law would be the proper remedy, since the case might be considered a simple case of an action to recover back money received under a mistake of fact. But it appears that the thing divided was assets, and it does not appear that the mistake made against plaintiff was a cash item. If the things divided were goods, notes or debts, it would be unfair to unsettle the adjustment made at the time without an inquiry into the value and results of what each got. To do this all should be parties, so that equity and justice may be done to all.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Ga. 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-preer-ga-1874.