Johnston v. Perkins

1 Pen. & W. 23
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Pen. & W. 23 (Johnston v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Perkins, 1 Pen. & W. 23 (Pa. 1829).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We cannot say that any part of the judgment was made up of interest since the appeal* or that the appellant succeeded to the amount of a farthing. The interest being a small’ matter, the plaintiff may have abandoned it: and although a contrary presumption might be made to support a judgment, it cannot to reverse one. The judgment for costs is not only possibly, but probably right; and we are not to reverse on suspicion of error.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Pen. & W. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-perkins-pa-1829.