Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Johnston v. O'Reilly

Johnston v. O'Reilly

70 A. 312, 74 N.J. Eq. 448, 4 Buchanan 448, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 272
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1908
StatusPublished

This text of 70 A. 312 (Johnston v. O'Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. O'Reilly, 70 A. 312, 74 N.J. Eq. 448, 4 Buchanan 448, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 272 (N.J. 1908).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order under review herein .should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Chancellor Magie.

[449]*449For affirmance• — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A. 312, 74 N.J. Eq. 448, 4 Buchanan 448, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-oreilly-nj-1908.