Johnston v. Menagh

4 Pa. Super. 154, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 99
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 17, 1897
DocketAppeal, No. 29
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Pa. Super. 154 (Johnston v. Menagh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnston v. Menagh, 4 Pa. Super. 154, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 99 (Pa. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wickham, J.,

In this case the court below dissolved the attachment, for the reason that the condition of the bond, given by the plaintiffs, ■ was not in accordance with the requirements of the act of assembly.

If called on to consider the merits of the case, as revealed by the record, and we could in no event go further, we would be compelled to say, that the proceedings in the court below are free from error. It is enough, however, to hold, as was done in the very similar case of Hoppes v. Houtz, 133 Pa. 34, that the order dissolving the attachment is interlocutory and not reviewable here, there being nothing to show any abuse of discretion.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoppes v. Houtz
19 A. 312 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Pa. Super. 154, 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-menagh-pasuperct-1897.